Aiding, assisting, procuring, or advising any ______ to practice chiropractic medicine contrary to this chapter.

Aiding, assisting, procuring, or advising any ______ to practice chiropractic medicine contrary to this chapter.

• A. Licensed person
• B. Unlicensed person
• C. Any person with consent
• D. A practitioner licensed in another state

Answer: (B)

This tests protecting the public by preventing unlicensed practice. The prohibition is about aiding, assisting, procuring, or advising someone who does not have a license to practice chiropractic medicine. Filling the blank with “unlicensed person” fits because the focus is on stopping any help given to someone who lacks authorization to practice, which keeps the profession limited to those who are properly licensed. Why the other options don’t fit: a licensed person already has authority to practice under the license; helping a licensed practitioner to violate the chapter isn’t the issue this rule addresses. including someone with consent doesn’t legalize unlicensed practice, and patient consent doesn’t change the need for proper licensure. a practitioner licensed in another state may be licensed there, but the rule targets those who are not licensed at all in the jurisdiction, not someone who holds a license elsewhere.

This tests protecting the public by preventing unlicensed practice. The prohibition is about aiding, assisting, procuring, or advising someone who does not have a license to practice chiropractic medicine. Filling the blank with “unlicensed person” fits because the focus is on stopping any help given to someone who lacks authorization to practice, which keeps the profession limited to those who are properly licensed.

Why the other options don’t fit: a licensed person already has authority to practice under the license; helping a licensed practitioner to violate the chapter isn’t the issue this rule addresses. including someone with consent doesn’t legalize unlicensed practice, and patient consent doesn’t change the need for proper licensure. a practitioner licensed in another state may be licensed there, but the rule targets those who are not licensed at all in the jurisdiction, not someone who holds a license elsewhere.